Medical School Admissions Consulting — Pricing

We offer two core types of service, based on where you are in your timeline — not on pressure, bundling tricks, or artificial complexity.

First: Application Consulting. This is for candidates actively applying in an upcoming cycle. We offer three tiers — Silver, Gold, and Platinum — each designed around a different level of need.

Silver ($4,450) covers the primary application: our full diagnostic and strategy process, school selection guidance, and the iterative drafting process for your personal statement. It’s built for candidates who have a clear plan, want expert positioning and a strong personal statement, and are comfortable handling secondaries, interviews, and peripherals independently.

Gold ($9,850) is the comprehensive package for most applicants. It includes everything in Silver plus up to ten secondary applications through our iterative drafting process, AMCAS/TMDSAS/AACOMAS application review, letters of recommendation support, standard interview prep, CASPer/PREview preparation, waitlist and offer management, and a blind second-consultant peer review of your first three schools’ materials. For most candidates, Gold is the right fit — it covers the full arc from primary through decision day.

Platinum ($13,550) adds depth and additional expert perspectives. Secondary coverage extends to twenty schools. Interview prep moves to our premium three-session model, which includes a blind interview with a second consultant who has zero prior exposure to your application. You also gain access to consultation with a practicing physician who reviews your strategy and materials in collaboration with your lead consultant, and a simulated committee evaluation that replicates how admissions readers actually weigh your candidacy. Platinum is built for candidates managing complex profiles, targeting the most competitive programs, or applying across a large number of schools.

Second: Advanced Planning. This is for candidates who are a year or more out — still completing prerequisites, building clinical hours, or preparing for the MCAT — and want structured strategic guidance before the cycle begins. Advanced Planning runs as a one-year engagement at three levels: Silver, Gold, and Platinum, differentiated by consulting hours (5, 10, or 20 beyond the initial strategy work). Pricing ranges from $2,960 to $7,020.

A la carte services — interview prep, LOR support, CASPer/PREview prep, rejection analysis, MCAT tutoring, post-interview reflection support — are available separately with published rates, generally between $275 and $1,190 per component.

In general, no. Our pricing reflects how the work is staffed and delivered, and we don’t routinely split payments or restructure packages as a default.

That said, if there’s a genuine timing or logistical constraint, we’re open to an honest conversation about whether there’s a clean way to make things work. Come talk to us.

These are fundamentally different products, built for different situations — and in medical school admissions, the distinction matters more than almost anywhere else.

A comprehensive package covers the full strategic arc. Every tier begins with our diagnostic assessment — a tool that maps you against the five behavioral dimensions medical school admissions committees are actually selecting for: Pioneering Spirit, Understanding, Leadership in Healing, Scholarly Depth, and Ethical Resilience. That feeds into a strategy deep-dive, school selection, and the iterative drafting process for your personal statement. You work with a lead consultant who owns strategy and positioning, plus a dedicated essay specialist who works at the sentence level. That dual-role model isn’t an upgrade — it’s the baseline.

The difference between tiers is scope and depth. Silver covers the primary application — strategy, school selection, and personal statement. It’s a focused engagement for candidates who need expert guidance on the foundation but can manage secondaries and peripherals independently. Gold opens up the full service: secondary essays for up to ten schools, application review, LOR support, interview prep, CASPer/PREview preparation, waitlist strategy, and a blind peer review. Platinum extends secondary coverage to twenty schools and adds premium interview prep, physician consultation, and a simulated committee evaluation.

Here’s why this matters specifically for med: medical school applications are uniquely labor-intensive. The primary establishes your narrative, but secondaries are where the real volume hits — each school sends its own prompts, often with tight turnaround windows, and the quality of those responses matters enormously. Gold and Platinum exist because managing ten to twenty school-specific essay sets at a high level, while maintaining strategic coherence across all of them, is a genuinely difficult challenge. That’s what you’re paying for beyond Silver.

Hourly and a la carte work is different. It’s best for candidates who already have a coherent strategy and need targeted help — sharpening a personal statement, prepping for MMI interviews, getting a post-rejection diagnostic. What it’s not designed to replace is full-cycle consulting. Building a coherent application argument across a primary and ten-plus secondaries takes sustained strategic work, not a one-off session.

The consultation call is where we sort this out. For med applicants, the deciding factors are usually the size of your school list and how much of the secondary sprint you want managed.

It depends on who you’re comparing us to — and what you think you’re actually paying for.

We sit where the value is real. Our consultants clear a hiring bar that eliminates roughly 95% of applicants, based on blind evaluation of work product. Every engagement pairs a lead strategist with a dedicated essay specialist as the standard, not an upsell. At Gold and Platinum levels, you’re also getting blind peer review, and at Platinum, direct input from practicing physicians and a simulated committee evaluation. That layered expertise isn’t cosmetic — it’s built into how the work actually gets done.

One thing worth understanding about this market: medical school admissions consulting varies enormously in what’s actually included. Some firms quote a lower base price but charge per secondary, which adds up quickly when you’re applying to fifteen schools. Others include secondaries but cap revision rounds. The sticker price comparison is almost never apples-to-apples. Our advice: ask any firm you’re evaluating exactly what’s covered, how many secondaries are included, who does the work, and what happens when the secondary sprint hits and turnaround windows tighten. If the answers are vague, that tells you something important.

If you’re looking for sharp judgment and serious work — especially during the intense secondary season — put us up against anyone. We’re comfortable there.

No. And the question itself tells you something useful about this industry.

Our packages are priced to cover the full scope of work most candidates actually need at each tier. We built it that way deliberately. Your consultant should be focused on what strengthens your application — not on whether a suggestion triggers an additional charge.

Two exceptions worth flagging. The first is rush work. Medical school secondaries already operate on compressed timelines, and our packages account for that pace. But when a candidate comes to us late in the cycle or needs to turn around materials faster than the standard workflow allows, maintaining quality requires outsized effort and reallocation of consultant capacity. We can provide rush support, but it comes at an additional cost — not as a penalty, but because it genuinely takes more to execute well under that kind of pressure.

The second is specialized services that fall outside standard packages — things like MCAT tutoring, post-interview reflection support, or rejection analysis for reapplicants. These are handled as separate a la carte items with clear, published rates. It wouldn’t be fair to bake those costs into standard pricing for everyone.

The principle is simple: most clients never see an extra charge. When something genuinely falls outside the expected scope, we talk about it clearly and in advance. The price you agree to is the price you pay. Full stop.

Yes — and in medical school admissions, it’s especially common.

The most frequent move is Silver to Gold. A candidate starts with the primary application package — strategy, school selection, personal statement — planning to handle secondaries independently. Then the secondary sprint arrives. Schools send prompts in waves, turnaround expectations are tight, and maintaining quality across ten or fifteen school-specific essay sets while also managing research, clinical hours, and everything else turns out to be a different challenge than expected. That’s when Gold starts to look less like an upgrade and more like a necessity.

Gold to Platinum happens too, usually when a candidate realizes their profile would benefit from the additional expert perspectives — the physician consultation, the simulated committee evaluation, or the premium interview prep with a blind evaluator. Or when the school list grows beyond ten secondaries and the additional coverage makes practical sense.

In both cases, pricing adjusts proportionally. You’re not penalized for starting lean, and the strategic foundation you’ve already built carries forward. You can also layer in a la carte services at any point — MCAT tutoring, CASPer/PREview prep, post-interview reflection support — if a specific need surfaces that wasn’t anticipated at the outset.

What we won’t do is push bigger packages upfront. If Silver genuinely fits your situation, we’ll say so. If the work later reveals that Gold or Platinum would serve you better, we’ll explain why and let you decide. The door stays open; any pressure to upgrade stays off.

One honest note specific to med: if you’re applying to more than five or six schools and plan to take secondaries seriously, Gold is almost certainly the right starting point. We’d rather tell you that now than watch you struggle in August.

We offer an initial grace period at the start of every engagement. During that window, you can adjust your service level — add scope, reduce scope, or cancel — for any reason. We build this in so you can commit with clarity, not pressure. If something doesn’t feel right once the process begins, it’s better to correct course early than to push through a poor fit.

After the grace period ends, we don’t offer refunds. At that point, your consultant and essay specialist have committed real, finite capacity to your work. We’re a boutique firm by design, and we don’t overbook — when we say yes to a client, it means saying no to someone else. That’s how we protect quality, and it’s why the policy needs to hold once the engagement is underway.

Rescheduling within an engagement is a different matter. Medical school timelines shift — MCAT retakes push things back, clinical rotations create scheduling conflicts, life intervenes. We work with you. Rigidity for its own sake helps no one. What we won’t do is leave an engagement indefinitely open-ended. There are practical limits to how long consultant capacity can be held, and we’ll be transparent about what’s feasible.

Read the policy carefully, ask questions, and make sure the fit feels right before you sign. That’s exactly what the consultation call is for. Once we start, we’re fully committed — and we need you to be too.

Advanced Planning hours are valid for one calendar year from the date of purchase. That’s intentional — open-ended engagements with no expiration tend to lose focus, and unfocused work doesn’t serve you well.

Within that year, usage is flexible. You and your consultant decide how to allocate the hours: strategy sessions, document reviews, mock interviews, or asynchronous feedback on activity descriptions and draft essays. Some candidates front-load the strategic work. Others spread it across the year as milestones arrive — MCAT prep decisions, clinical experience planning, research positioning, early essay drafts. The structure adapts to your situation.

For application packages, the engagement is inherently cycle-driven. Your package covers the schools you’re applying to in a given cycle. If circumstances change and you need to defer to the next cycle, that’s a conversation — not an automatic rollover, but not a dead end either. We’ll work with you on what makes sense.

The underlying principle is the same across all service types: the hours you pay for are real consulting time with real people. They’re not tokens in a vending machine. Use them with intention, and they’ll produce results.

Usually, yes — with some practical constraints worth understanding.

If you’re mid-engagement and realize this cycle isn’t realistic — your MCAT score isn’t where it needs to be, clinical hours are thinner than you thought, the personal statement needs more development than the timeline allows — shifting to the next cycle is a conversation we’re happy to have. We’d rather recalibrate around a realistic timeline than rush you into a weaker application.

This comes up more often in med than in other contexts, and for good reason. Medical school admissions committees look at the full picture — GPA trends, MCAT scores, clinical and research hours, letters of recommendation — and a premature application with visible gaps can do real damage, especially because many schools track reapplicants. Waiting a cycle to strengthen the profile isn’t just a timing decision. It can be the strategically stronger move.

What we can’t guarantee is that the exact same consultant capacity will be available in a later cycle. Our strongest consultants fill their rosters ahead of each application season. If you signal the shift early, continuity is almost always preserved. If it happens late, we may need to adjust — and we’ll be upfront about what that looks like.

The strategic work doesn’t expire. Your assessment results, your positioning, your school selection logic — all of it carries forward. What changes is pacing and logistics, not the quality of the foundation you’ve built.

Honestly? Not always.

If your profile is clear-cut — strong MCAT, solid GPA, meaningful clinical and research experience, a clear narrative, and a manageable school list — you may not need comprehensive consulting at all. A focused a la carte session to sharpen your personal statement or pressure-test your school list could be plenty, and we’d rather you save the money than invest in support you don’t actually need.

Where consulting starts to earn its keep is when the stakes are high and the complexity is real. Medical school admissions is arguably the most demanding application process of any professional program. The sheer volume of material — primary application, activity descriptions, personal statement, ten to twenty secondaries each with their own prompts and tight turnaround windows — creates execution challenges that compound fast. And unlike MBA or law school, the admissions criteria extend well beyond essays and test scores into clinical hours, research experience, letters from physicians, CASPer/PREview assessments, and interview formats that range from traditional to MMI. Managing all of that coherently, so that every piece reinforces the same strategic argument, is genuinely difficult to do alone.

It matters most in situations like these: you’re a nontraditional applicant — career changer, post-bacc, or older candidate — whose path to medicine needs a clear and compelling frame. You’re a reapplicant who needs to understand what went wrong without repeating it. You’re competitive on paper but applying to reach schools where acceptance rates are in the single digits. You’re managing a large school list and the secondary sprint is about to hit. Or you’re strong in some dimensions but have a visible gap — limited research, a GPA dip, a gap year that needs explaining — and need to address it with care rather than hope it goes unnoticed.

The real question isn’t whether med school consulting is “worth it” in the abstract. It’s whether the gap between doing this yourself and doing it with expert, process-aware guidance is large enough for you specifically. For some candidates, that gap is small. For others, it’s the difference between a cycle that produces results and one that doesn’t.

The consultation call is free. That first conversation is where you start to find out.

Some are. Some aren’t. And the honest answer to whether it matters is more nuanced than most firms want you to believe.

Let’s start with what sounds reassuring on paper: all of our consultants are practicing physicians. It’s a compelling line — and in many cases, a credential that obscures more than it reveals. Practicing medicine is one of the most time-intensive, cognitively demanding professions there is. A physician operating at a genuinely high level — managing patients, running a service, publishing research, navigating the demands of an academic medical center — does not also have the bandwidth to shepherd an application from intake through decision day. The people with the most clinical credibility are, almost by definition, the people with the least availability for this work. When a firm says all their consultants are practicing MDs, the real question is: practicing how much — and consulting how well?

On the other end of the spectrum are admissions consultants with no medical background at all. Many are excellent at the mechanics of the process — essay structure, school selection, narrative clarity. But there’s a layer of insight they can approximate without ever fully owning: what medicine actually feels like from the inside. The clinical reasoning, the ethical weight, the hierarchy, the texture of being in the room when things go sideways. Admissions committees are staffed by people who live inside that world. The person guiding you should have meaningful access to that perspective — not as a buzzword, but as a real input into how your candidacy is framed.

So what’s the right model? Both — structured deliberately.

Your primary consultant owns your engagement end to end. They understand the admissions landscape thoroughly. They’ve cleared our blind screening process, and we’re selective about who joins our team, not for prestige but because the quality of your consultant matters more than anything else we do. Some of these consultants are MDs or current residents. Some are not. What they all share is mastery of the actual job: diagnosing a profile, building a coherent strategy, and helping a candidate through the most demanding application process in higher education. Their value isn’t the letters after their name. It’s their judgment, craft, and ability to make you better.

In addition to that person — not instead of them — every engagement includes structured input from an MD who is actively inside the system. These are graduates of top medical schools and training programs, close enough to admissions that their insight isn’t stale, and credentialed enough that their clinical perspective carries real weight. They review strategy and materials at key moments — early positioning, mid-process calibration, pre-submission — and feed their perspective directly back to your lead consultant, who integrates it into the ongoing work.

This isn’t a token MD review checkbox. It’s a structural advantage. The physician brings the insider lens — how an admissions committee member who also runs a residency program actually reads an application, what clinical framing resonates, what sounds performative, where a narrative rings true or false. Your lead consultant brings the strategic and editorial depth to act on those insights across every component of the application. Two distinct skill sets, woven into a single process.

Be thoughtful about firms that charge a premium for MD consultants as though the degree itself is the differentiator. The question isn’t whether your consultant went to medical school. It’s whether the person managing your application is excellent at this specific work — and whether you also have access to real clinical perspective at the moments it matters most. Our model is designed to give you both.